aniseisley
New member
The listing describes BlockCrux’s readers as builders, founders and developers, and its suggested uses include infrastructure, Layer-1 and Layer-2 news. For a press release on BlockCrux about a technical upgrade, borrow the structure of good release notes.
What changed. One sentence stating the upgrade and its version: “[Protocol] released v[X.Y], adding [feature] to [component].”
Why it matters. One sentence on the practical effect for builders, such as lower costs, a new capability or an easier migration. Skip adjectives.
Who is affected. Say who needs to act: node operators, app developers, validators, or no one.
How to get started. Link the documentation, repository and migration guide. Developers will click through.
Compatibility and risks. Name what breaks, what’s deprecated, and what’s still in testing. Being upfront here builds trust.
Proof. A named audit, testnet results, or mainnet date. Keep every figure verifiable.
Quote and about. One short quote that explains a decision, then a boilerplate and a contact.
Example opening: “[Protocol] today released v2.0 of its [component], adding [feature]. App developers need no changes, and node operators should upgrade by [date]. Documentation and migration notes are at [link].”
For the submission, the listing is $300 (shown as reduced from $400), and the page links a live example. It doesn’t state a turnaround time, so confirm the current one with support. You upload a DOC or PDF and check out. Guaranteed results aren’t promised, and no provider should promise them.
What changed. One sentence stating the upgrade and its version: “[Protocol] released v[X.Y], adding [feature] to [component].”
Why it matters. One sentence on the practical effect for builders, such as lower costs, a new capability or an easier migration. Skip adjectives.
Who is affected. Say who needs to act: node operators, app developers, validators, or no one.
How to get started. Link the documentation, repository and migration guide. Developers will click through.
Compatibility and risks. Name what breaks, what’s deprecated, and what’s still in testing. Being upfront here builds trust.
Proof. A named audit, testnet results, or mainnet date. Keep every figure verifiable.
Quote and about. One short quote that explains a decision, then a boilerplate and a contact.
Example opening: “[Protocol] today released v2.0 of its [component], adding [feature]. App developers need no changes, and node operators should upgrade by [date]. Documentation and migration notes are at [link].”
For the submission, the listing is $300 (shown as reduced from $400), and the page links a live example. It doesn’t state a turnaround time, so confirm the current one with support. You upload a DOC or PDF and check out. Guaranteed results aren’t promised, and no provider should promise them.